More doubts

1. In the structure for Programme of Study, there is this:

References and bibliography Indicate the importance of previous related studies by providing evidence of key texts/(theories/approaches/sources) and state their relevance to the proposed project (refer to work in your portfolio)

Do we have to "talk" about the bibliography and write what we intend to investigate more, or should we just refer to what we've read, as a normal bibliography?

2. I feel the necessity of repeating the some of the information in both documents (like facts and figures)... Is it too bad? Because it's difficult to rewrite it in a way that "looks" different.

Thanks, rita.